Close
My Cart (0 items)

Login to TEN

Privacy Policy
Return
My Cart (0 items)
101823
Individual Podcasts

Subpoenas - Obtaining Information in Course of Commercial Litigation

Issuing a subpoena carries a number of procedural and ethical risk factors. This session looks at best practice when gathering information in the course of litigation. It includes: What how and where of issuing a subpoena – some practical matters Issuing a subpoena for legiti

Date/Time

About the Podcast

Issuing a subpoena carries a number of procedural and ethical risk factors. This session looks at best practice when gathering information in the course of litigation. It includes:

  • What how and where of issuing a subpoena – some practical matters
  • Issuing a subpoena for legitimate and proper purposes – what does this mean?
  • Ensuring material sought is relevant to the proceedings – the relevant test
  • Specifying documents with reasonable particularity
  • Ensuring the subpoena is not oppressive
  • What if documents sought are confidential?
  • Power of court to set aside a subpoena
  • What if you are not the recipient but still wish to set aside the subpoena?
  • Ethical obligations and subpoenas
  • Subpoenas and Notices to Produce
  • Request for Further and Better Particulars and subpoenas

Presented By

Dr Anton Hughes
Barrister, Maurice Byers Chambers Sydney, NSW

After graduating with a Bachelor of Engineering in Computer Systems in 1996, Anton worked as a programmer at a publicly listed telecommunications company, and in the mobile communications division of NEC Australia, before setting up his own consulting firm, developing web-based remote access solutions for educational institutions.

Anton graduated with a Bachelor of Laws with Honours in 2004. Having developed an interest in intellectual property over the course of his studies, he enrolled in a PhD, researching the patentability of software. He was awarded his PhD in 2012.

Anton was admitted as a lawyer in 2009. Since then, he has taken every opportunity to follow his dream of being an intellectual property barrister. He worked as Associate to Justice Porter of the Supreme Court of Tasmania from 2009 to 2011. He then worked for Legal Aid in Hobart and Sydney, in order to work on his advocacy skills.

Anton was called to the bar in 2013. One of his earliest cases involved appearing for the Commissioner in Research Affiliates v Commissioner of Patents, which remains one of the leading cases on the patentability of alleged inventions in Australia.

CPD Information

0.2 CPD units

Enquiries/Assistance

If you need assistance or have an enquiry, please do not hesitate to contact us, on (03) 8601 7700 or email: [email protected]

Go to top